Perfect. That means no jury, of any kind in any court anywhere on earth has found Trump committed rape. Exactly like I said.
You see, the jury was using NY Penal Law (as they were required to do), but Kaplan decided to use a dictionary and other codes until he found a reason to call it rape. The odd part is, the appeal was about the judgement and, because they found Trump did not commit rape, none of the award was related to rape. Kaplan could have simply made that point and still denied the motion.
Gee...I wonder why a liberal judge would go through the trouble of lying about a jury verdict against the presidential nominee of the republican party and search until he found something to support the lie when it wasn't necessary? No need to answer, that was a rhetorical question.