Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
No, I really mean that.
Clinically.
You only "know more" than the presiding judge because you ignore the relevant parts of the verdict he MUST address.
You're a **** idiot.
Is there another "rape" question where the term "RAPE" is specifically in the question?? No??
Well, then, there isn't any RAPE that we can find now is there, DICKFACED IMBECILE??
Please, TAKE YOUR CURB STOMPING AND SHUT THE **** UP. YOU got PWNED and can't seem to understand that when your hole is so deep you can't get out, you STOP DIGGING DEEPER AND DEEPER!!