Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
28,463 posts
*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Again, for the 6 year old with ADHD and poor reading skills, you, this is not about what the judge said.
Thank you for proving my analysis about you correct.
But, child, it IS.
Once the jury renders a judgment ANY interpretation of that judgment is EXCLUSIVELY a matter for judges..first the presiding judge, and if sucessfully appealed, appellate judges.
If you haven't read the filing, ProjectoLass, you have nothing to contribute.
You know your rule.