User avatar
*Beekeeper
Today 6:44 am
User avatar
      
7,008 posts
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Checkmate indeed.

Once AGAIN, you LOSE and FAILED THE TEST!!

The JUDGE gets no say in a JURY VERDICT, DICKWEED. So that is a MOOT POINT IN ALL REGARDS!! 

He can't under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES attempt to find something a JURY NEVER FOUND!! He even ADMITS that that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE UNDER THE NY STATE PENAL CODE!! Simple as that as did the JURY have that SAME FINDING. 

NO RAPE OCCURRED!! But some PARTISAN HACK JUDGE trying to reframe it for you LWNJ's isn't a VERDICT OF THE JURY!! 

AND the questions isn't what some hack judge said, and it's simple- "DID A JURY FIND TRUMP GUILTY OF RAPING CARROLL"??

Answer- NO!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2024 Liberal Forum