Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
28,718 posts
*Beekeeper » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
No, DICKFACE
, what matters is what the LAW says the verdict CAN BE based on how rape is defined, and in this case, the JURY found that NO RAPE OCCURRED!! A JUDGE does NOT get to re-determine what the verdict is or isn't based on "public opinion". HE MUST FOLLOW WHAT THE LAW SAYS!!! PERIOD!!!
IF you fail to comprehend that ONE SIMPLE REALITY OF A FAIR JUSTICE SYSTEM, then you are nothing more than a NAZI PIECE OF MAGGOT ****!! Because that's how they do things in ALL Dictatorships and the NAZIS were the worst, just like you are!!
A JUDGE CANNOT OVERRULE A JURY UNLESS IT'S IN THE FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT!! PERIOD!! They can't make determinations that a verdict of not guilty is wrong, otherwise, there is no JUSTICE SYSTEM, but something not even a piece of maggot **** like you would never like or agree to!! And that is PRECISELY what Kaplan was attempting to do here. And another very good reason this case is going to be tossed on its *** on appeal!!
Who responds to any of a respondent's post verdict motions?