User avatar
*Beekeeper
Today 1:37 pm
User avatar
      
7,011 posts
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: Who responds to any of a respondent's post verdict motions?

Is that your "defense" to getting your *** HANDED TO YOU ON THE VERDICT PART???

Damn, boy, you are REALLY grasping at **** straws!!! It doesn't matter WHO responds because a NOT GUILTY VERDICT has no "post-verdict" recourse. To allow such "motions" would be a VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE of our US Constitution. When a JURY says "not guilty" or 'NO" in a civil verdict, there is no other "explanation" or "motions" needed OR ALLOWED BY LAW!!

But you don't give 2 **** about that now do you, MAGGOT MOUTH PIECE OF ****???
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2024 Liberal Forum