21 Jan 2022 8:30 pm
Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ What are the odds that Yahoo administrations would nominate SIX CONSECUTIVE anti abortion jurists?
Exactly, BV. The fact is, Republicans under the auspices of the Heritage Foundation and their associates in the Federalist Society have been influencing judgeships for quite some time.According to whom was SCOTUS "liberal" and when?
Not all if us are hip to The Gospel of Slizzy, Slizzy..
They even provide Republicans a list of recommended nominees, those committed to a conservative (and often FAR RIGHT) IDEOLOGY. And like I said, this conservative led SCOTUS has been largely catering to Trump's maladministration and Republicans for some time in their shadow documents, at times deciding in their favor with little or no deliberation.
Opinions | The Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ helped Trump 28 times. Biden is 0 for 1.
Only of late, shortly after news of their actions saw light of day, did justices Barrett, Breyer (a liberal), and Thomas speak of concerns about their public perception, though the last, Thomas (the most biased among them naturally), took a defensive posture in which he attempted to deny that partiality.
Justice Barrett Concerned About Public Perception of Supreme Court | RealClearPolitics
Stephen Breyer worries about Supreme Court's public standing in current political era - CNNPolitics
Clarence Thomas warns against 'destroying our institutions,' defends the Supreme Court | TheHill