Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 11:44 am

Yea....whatever...

But the biggest hurdle is the staggering costs of drilling in a brand-new area where equipment, manpower and electricity would all need to be brought in.

 "ANWR could be a very expensive zone to start in. It has little infrastructure," Per Magnus, head of analysis at Rystad Energy, told CNN Business.

Unless a "massive discovery" happens, Magnus said that breakeven costs could be around $80 to $85 a barrel. That's roughly double the breakeven levels in the low-cost Permian Basin

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/18/business ... index.html

Post the date of that article, DumbassStreamofBullzeet.

So let's see if you've got the balls to take a stand on your moronic position today, and answer a very simple question.
Based on YOUR acceptance of the lying scumbags at CNN who all hate Trump, are you claiming that the oil companies WILL NOT DRILL IN ALASKA once Trump removes all the fees, regulations, and obstacles that your demented Alzheimer's patient put in place?  Or that they won't be drilling and fracking there unless oil prices rise to $100 a barrel or higher?

Defend your position now, you dickless cretin!