Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CARTER GREW THE ECONOMY MUCH BETTER THAN REAGAN
24 Apr 2014 12:41 am
Lol. I gotta throw any rock I can lay hand to.tharock220 » 24 Apr 2014 12:36 am » wrote:
Great. We're not arguing about who was better fiscally. We're arguing about their respective economies.
It's too hard to judge Reagan's economy, unless we can agree on how to account for the fact that it has never been paid for - account for the fact that it set a new direction of borrow and spend, run up the debt, spend like Jesus is gonna fix it. It was a James Watt style presidency. How do we separate out how nice the dinner tasted from the fact that it STILL has never been paid for?
HOW DO WE CALL IT REAGAN'S ECONOMY, IF THE PEOPLE TASKED TO PAY FOR IT WERE NOT EVEN BORN YET? WASN'T IT THEIR ECONOMY, IF THEY ARE THE ONES PAYING FOR IT?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?