User avatar
ConsRule
19 Dec 2024 7:11 pm
User avatar
     
3,376 posts
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 7:03 pm » wrote: like talking to very stupid moss.
What you apparently are too stupid to understand, in that filing by Kaplan he was NOT making a ruling on the issues of fact (the allegations) in the case of Carroll v Trump.  He was ruling on the appeal by Trump on the size of the award.  He offered his OPINION on the issue of rape and acknowledged it was based on common parlance definition and NOT BASED on NY Law.  The findings on the allegations in the case had already been made by the jury.  The mystery (in my opinion) is why he even addressed rape since not one single dollar of the award was related to rape.  Primarily because a jury cannot award damages when they rule something was not proven.
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search