User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Dec 2024 7:16 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,454 posts
ConsRule » 19 Dec 2024, 8:11 pm » wrote: What you apparently are too stupid to understand, in that filing by Kaplan he was NOT making a ruling on the issues of fact (the allegations) in the case of Carroll v Trump.  He was ruling on the appeal by Trump on the size of the award.  He offered his OPINION on the issue of rape and acknowledged it was based on common parlance definition and NOT BASED on NY Law.  The findings on the allegations in the case had already been made by the jury.  The mystery (in my opinion) is why he even addressed rape since not one single dollar of the award was related to rape.  Primarily because a jury cannot award damages when they rule something was not proven.
Why do you presume to explain to me, lying bumpkin?
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search