Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2024, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑
You keep giving way too much power away to nigraphobia, son.
They're on their own. You cannot stop them from growing their population, and you cannot put them increasing their population on me.
The issue that you and I have is that you side with the reset crowd, and I utterly oppose their ****. Against ALL evidence - evidence that you have been shown over and over, and have ignored over and over, - you cling to DOCTRINE. And you attack me with bumper stickers: more people means more ***, man!; India is filthy - you think they need ANOTHER billion people? These are **** bumper stickers, dude - not arguments. You actually have no arguments. Every argument you have ever made, I have mercy-killed.
In 1960, around 40% of rural residents and 50% of urban residents were considered to be living in abject poverty. We're talking real poverty - food insecurity, zero hygiene. Basically living like primitive animals and dying young. The average age of death was 43.
Today, 8.5% of Indians live in abject poverty. The average age of death is 68.
You don't have an argument. You have a doctrine, and you have a bumper sticker. Well, a collection of bumper stickers.
https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/indica ... S/rankings
Yeah, the answer for how to deal with billions of 70 to 80 IQ Stone Age People is to increase their numbers by a million percent.....
It wasn't a massive increase of population that improved India....that's preposterous

.just some basic improvements to their transportation system so that their usual surplus supply of food and supplies could get into the hands of the people.
Problem with UNICEF though is every time they improve the quality of life of the primitive people the primitive people reward us with population explosions.
https://www.unicef.org/india/