Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 5:51 am

Connie,

You have lied about the Judge. You invented a context for his comments in which you persist. Your assertions are supported by nothing but your reflexive anti-semitism and passion for Yam Jesus.

That the jury found Grifty liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff is a FACT. That both the DoJ and DoD consider such an act of rape is a FACT. That you've lied about the Judge's motivation and reasoning is a FACT.

So why the **** are you whining.....other than because it is what MAGAts do?

I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff.  What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law.  That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award.  How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.

Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan.  If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.

Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect.  Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.