Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
53,916 posts
ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑
I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff. What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law. That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award. How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.
Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan. If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.
Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect. Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.
What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident,
Stop presuming to explain things to me, Connie.
You don't have the onions for that job.
How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.
Stop with your presumption.
If you are so **** smart, explain why Kaplan places rape in quotation marks.
No ****, just reasoning.