Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 6:47 am

I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff.  What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law.  That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award.  How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.

Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan.  If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.

Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect.  Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.

Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan.  If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie

However, he chose to ignore (lie) about their verdict on question 1 (where they followed NY law) and redefine the parameters outside of NY law rather than focus on the things actually related to their award.

You see, the jury was using NY Penal Law (as they were required to do), but Kaplan decided to use a dictionary and other codes until he found a reason to call it rape.  The odd part is, the appeal was about the judgement and, because they found Trump did not commit rape, none of the award was related to rape. 

And the filing is completely irrelevant. 

By the way, none of the jury award was related to rape. Which makes me wonder why Kaplan felt the need to lie about that portion of the case.  

The opinion has no legal authority.