Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2024, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2024, 11:02 pm

You better double check what your census report considers "home ownership".
Unless the home is totally paid off your statistic  is a lie.
Let me know what the total percentage is of Americans who  are living in homes that are totally paid off.
If you could make our population decrease by half tomorrow...home values would decrease a similar amount, way more people would be living in paid off homes and with that  true wealth skyrockets for a greater percentage of the people.


 
Even though our population has increased massively since 1980...home ownership rates are UNCHANGED.

Are you making a concerted effort to appear obtuse? Just look at your stupid chart. It climbs MOUNT **** EVEREST from 94 to 2004, yeah? But that stupid mountain it is climbing is only 5 percentage points. The chart is built for tards, by tards. Look at the 65.6 starting point. Now look at the apex of the climb. There is only a 3.4% separation between those numbers.

As to your ***-SILLY argument about homes being "completely paid off," you have offered not a SHRED of evidence regarding what percentage of homes carried mortgages in any given year. Your chart says nothing about it, AND your chart is really, really stupid.

So, you've brought up another non-issue, you've made no actual argument whatsoever, and you've backed your non-argument with a chart that does not comment on your non-argument. 

It really does look like your throwing the game, son.