Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 23 Dec 2024, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2024, 7:57 am

Which is DIRECTLY refuted by the statistics I have presented and you have failed to rebut.

Your rebuttal must address the argument, not flee it.

You've not at all. You ran an abortion of an argument about home ownership in a single country, and then you refuted your own argument in the very next post. Not that the argument would have been worth a damn if you HADN'T, since it was utterly irrelevant to the topic.

Give me the bullet points of these arguments you believe refuted - nay, even bothered to address - my critique of your anti-population claim.

Location, location, location. Speculation, speculation, speculation. Social insanity in California is not a good reason to kill of the people in Bangladesh. And as you correctly point out, you can live anywhere you want. And you can even bitch about it while you live there - perfectly legal.

Fewer people means less roads. You can google it. Toll roads are as old as written history - because roads have to be paid for, and fewer hands makes more work.

Wait - which people are you thinking about doing away with? We might be approaching synthesis.

I think audio books is a better idea than genocide.