Let’s say the factual background is correct. For the sake of argument. You argument seems to be that a contractor that is maintaining a WH server can take information, give it to lawyers, and then go to another agency to report it all because they are u dear contract.Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You see if you omit the fact he was under contract by the government yeah this looks bad.
Just drop most of the facts from this story and yeah it looks bad
Good job fox news you fooled the idiots once again.