Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑
At the time, all we had was that story AND the court filling. At that time that was the story.
And yet I don't see you posting any thing that refutes it. You have Sussmann's lawyers asking to have the factual background section removed or at least a portion of it. THEY are saying ONE "fact" is incorrect. I posted about that on one of the other threads where you trolled me.
That narrative is still not challenged.
At the time, all we had was that story AND the court filling. At that time that was the story.
no...that's a lie.
There was nothing new in the filing, just a "retelling", the sole purpose of which was to wag the dog.
Stinkbait for the Stupid.
And yet I don't see you posting any thing that refutes it.
It has been posted for days.
I will...if you stipulate that you will acknowledge it when done.
That narrative is still not challenged.
Your cureent position is that the narrative isn't **** because that's what FOX told you.
No, my position is when that narrative was posted, based on the story AT THE TIMR and the filing, the summary is accurate. You have not posted anything to dispute.