Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 11:08 am

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 11:03 am

More questions.  I'll answer.

That link, on another thread, is informing you that SUSSMANN and his lawyers are telling you that.  As I have often said let the court's figure it out.

Additionally, that same link informs you that is the ONLY FACT that SUSSMANN and the lawyers are saying is wrong,  

The narrative, based on the filing and the article, is accurate.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/30/politics ... index.html

"Tech Executive-1." In 2016, Joffe, who has not been previously identified, worked with researchers to collect internet data about the Trump Organization that Sussmann took to the FBI


Do you want to confirm the date of that story?

 

I did not post that link.  Here is the link I posted, moron:

That seems to be the case the case for the meeting with the CIA:

The five-year statute of limitations appears to have passed for Durham to accuse Sussmann of any wrongdoing related to his meeting with the CIA.

The other issue is Sussmann's attorney's are only denying one fact from the Factual Background section of the filing.

They said Durham had a fact wrong: that Sussmann told the CIA about internet data related to Russian phones being used around the White House before Trump was President, and not from after he took office.

Durham's most recent assertions in court about Sussmann implied that the CIA heard from him about Russian phones being used around the White House after Trump became President as a way to raise the intelligence communities' suspicions about Trump.

But Sussmann says that isn't so

https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/politics ... index.html

They did not address any other allegations, particularly Trump Tower

My answer stands.  If you have a new point you would like to make go ahead and make.  Until then the courts will figure it out.