I am not slinking away. Although in the motion Durham never said what the time frame was CONCERNING THE WH DATA Fox reported it as during the Trump Administration, which was incorrect. This is their Bloomberg moment.
Next, you still have the data from Trump Towers. That is not being disputed by Sussmann. Additionally, all of this is in the factual background section, not where the charges are. The WH was mentioned because one of Sussmann’s lawyers worked at the WH as Deputy WH Counsel when it occurred and may be a conflict of interest.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/us/d ... trump.html
Additionally, I have posted Sussman’s stance on the WH portion earlier in the week. No sir, you are lying again when you claim I am slinking away.