User avatar
Blackvegetable
18 Feb 2022 9:26 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ I am not slinking away.  Although in the motion Durham never said what the time frame was CONCERNING THE WH DATA Fox reported it as during the Trump Administration, which was incorrect.  This is their Bloomberg moment.

Next, you still have the data from Trump Towers.  That is not being disputed by Sussmann.  Additionally, all of this is in the factual background section, not where the charges are.  The WH was mentioned because one of Sussmann’s lawyers worked at the WH as Deputy WH Counsel when it occurred and may be a conflict of interest.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/us/d ... trump.html

Additionally, I have posted Sussman’s stance on the WH portion earlier in the week.  No sir, you are lying again when you claim I am slinking away.
THE WH DATA Fox reported it as during the Trump Administration, which was incorrect.  This is their Bloomberg moment.
what were these frequent FOX **** called before 2017?

Does your narrative remain unchallenged, or do you now acknowledge that it is ****?

Please don't add more unnecessary words to your diet.
 
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search