Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 30 Jan 2025, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 8:52 pm

Pauper?

Something tells me you don't have two coins to rub together, Clete.

It worked fine for me.

When the headline of your source refutes you, you're pretty stupid to use that source.

It becomes obvious that you just grab **** and slam it without even looking at it - a Gish Galloper who posts **** unworthy of attention.

Hey stupid!  The "headline" DID NOT refute anything!  It merely points out the first of several levels of the qualifications used to determine wealth.  And OF COURSE you read the rest of it.  The fact that you can't admit reading beyond the first line when I've posted it repeatedly tells me what a weak, feeble pauper you must be to be SO intimidated by someone else's wealth.

So allow me continue to shove it in your impoverished face, as I can only imagine how painful it must be for someone as destitute as you are to be reminded of what a failure you've been all your miserable life!:

What is considered upper class in NJ?To be considered upper class in New Jersey, it typically requires a high annual income. To put it into perspective:– To be in the top 20% of earners, you need to make at least $181,484 annually.– To be in the top 5%, you need to make at least $250,000 and up.
 What is the 1% wealth in New Jersey?To be in the top 1% of wealth in New Jersey:– You need to earn at least $800,000 annually.– High earners in this category pay one of the steepest tax rates in the country.

Did you read it NOW, you blubbering buffoon?