That is a pretty sleazy answer, little boy.
It follows this exchange:
Cannonpointer » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑
jefftec » Today, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑
.,..at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel ..., that he is aiming to
raise living standards in that region.
Which part of the Constitution empowers him to proceed with American tax dollars to "raise the living standards in that region"?
You "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"???
You brought it up, fruitcake. YOU said YOU support him "raising living standards in that region."
I asked where in the Constitution he was empowered to use OUR money to that end, and you could not think of ANY reference supporting that frame of thought?
How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?