Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Who is actually in charge of The White House?
13 Feb 2025 9:38 pm
And then I asked where Trump was empowered by our Constitution to spend OUR treasure making OTHER countries better.jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ here I said: "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"??? yeah, I said it....
.... and this too ...."at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel ..., that he is aiming to raise living standards in that region".
I'm still waiting for an answer.
You JUST GOT THROUGH DEFENDING Trump spending our treasure there. If you don't care, tell the you of that post to shut the **** up and stop defending that ****.jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Then you raised the Constitutional question, which is a good question, I see your point. The "raise the living standards in that region" could be only another money disaster. ........just don't have a dog in that fight for what happens at the Gaza region......don't care...
The board is no better informed of your principles by any of this ^ than we were when you were defending then not defending then defending then not defending Trump spending our treasure in israel.jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ .....and here you are.....How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
....He doesn't have it.. ...
And like any politician.....the decision that they make have to be scrutinized....understandably....
Here you are....."Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.here"
....oh yes, about my "position"......my position is that I voted my conscience when I voted for Trump. Is every decision he makes going to be good? Probably not. Is every decision I make going to be good? probably not either. .....I'm just going to see what he does and am certain he'll be great. That's my position....
....
This includes those of us who understood the real purpose of my question in the first place - which was to demonstrate that you have none, than none guide you. We are no more informed than were were before - just reminded and reinforced.
You have at least become aware that there are Constitutional implications - ya just don't care. Because ya have no principles.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?