19 Mar 2022 9:52 pm
Again, explaining to a midwit the unreliability of one outlier in making a cause and effect argument is like explaining the function of a ceiling fan to a house pet.ScottMon » 19 Mar 2022, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Except lockdowns DID work in New Zealand. You can't argue against the numbers.
So there's THAT.
And then there's the fact that when refuted, you flee - making you unworthy of any serious effort. But here's a quick once over (more than you merit):
Lockdowns did not work in Iran, Pakistan, Malaysia or Nepal - police states which enacted more stringent lockdowns sooner than New Zealand. You don't know how to look into things, and when people look into things FOR you, you don't know how to properly accept it. You're a dud.
From the BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-52103747
You impute cause and effect in one outlier, then assume that the cause and effect which may or may NOT be true reflects some universal principle - notwithstanding the principle is disproved over and over in non-outlier samples. It's like arguing with a screen door. The light hits, but does not reflect.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?