Yesterday 6:51 pm
I am the one that said it was a mistake...to which you called ****. That means you think it WAS NOT A MISTAKE. If it wasn't a mistake, it had to be intentional. I asked you to provide proof they intentionally misstated the amounts. You have yet to provide that proof. Until you do, I WILL NOT answer your question. You may not like that...but tough ****.Blackvegetable » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ By how many orders of magnitude did DOGE overstate its efficiency according to the excerpt?
at which point you are shown that it wasn't "a mistake"....it was 5 mistakes.
Your question was answered. Honestly, accurately and completely.
Then your question morphed, and you assumed a position of abject submission.
My question remains unanswered.