Vigilant against whom, and why?
Was it because he stood up - an idealistic youth - when the police stood down?
And you say that he wasn't protecting HIS property. So he was protecting his neighbors' property? At 17?
Sounds admirable.
I see that you didn't competently follow the court case. Sworn testimony that went to the jury says otherwise.
You are entitled to your own opinion, **** up and based on emotional misfittery though it be. But you
do not get your own facts, no matter HOW much melanin you carry.
Again, counter to what the jury heard. What the JURY heard - and ruled on - was that HE, Rittenhouse, was the hunted and not the hunter.
In fact - sit so ya don't fall, bombshell information coming - it was all on VIDEO. They actually SAW the hunting of the minor child by cowardly adult felons unfold in real time from multiple angles. And you know what they say. A picture is more valuable than all of the stupid you can spray.
The jackass felon who pulled that gun got himself shot by his better.
So, guilt by association. Very high minded of you. But you are very "liberal" to grant that the kid "MIGHT" not be a white supremacist. Just as I am liberal to grant that you MGIHT not be a ***. See how that works? I just did you a solid - a very liberal and generous gesture on my part.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?