Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑
Ducked the question. And lied.
Huey » 31 Mar 2022, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑
Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑3. Has no one informed you that the civilian was in truth run over by an A.A. gun piloted by a hastily retreating Ukrainian soldier?
3. I was referring to the tank a few a weeks that obviously swerved to intentionally run over a civilians car.
And here's how we know you lied. ^
You drank the propaganda about who and what it was. You allowed what you HEARD to utterly taint what you SAW.
It wasn't a tank and it wasn't a Russian. You have no idea what you saw - not the first clue. You have NARRATIVE.
You say it "obviously" swerved, "to run over that car." Like it isn't even
possible that it lost control. It was going like a bat out of hell.
Still not a **** tank - a mobile AA gun. Every tank has a designation. If that was a Russian tank, a very BASIC google search will tell us what Russian tank it was. Was it a T-72? A T-80? A T-90?
WHICH RUSSIAN TANK DID YOU SEE, HUEY? TELL US WHAT RUSSIAN TANK
YOU SAW "DELIBERATELY SWERVE" TO RUN OVER A CAR. You're a **** witness to a crime - an EYE witness.
Let's hear your **** testimony, *** - WHAT RUSSIAN TANK WAS THAT?
Do you need to check in with your counsel before you give us your eye witness testimony? The law firm of MSNBC and Fox?