3 Apr 2022 10:45 am
Are these your words, DMA?Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."
And:
The Presidential Records Act outlines that the office of the presidency has an obligation to adequately document activities of the president. But there is little to no enforcement mechanism to ensure the law is followed. While there are criminal consequences for the destruction of government records, there are none that penalize the failure to create them in the first place.
You get your face off the mat now. Unless you show there was destruction of records no law was broken.
I still accept your surrender.
Just "yes", or "no".That is NOT the missing phone log story. Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues