3 Apr 2022 10:57 am
Dwarf,Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Those are my words taken from this post:
1. That is NOT the missing phone log story. Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.
2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:
But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues."It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."
Then there is this:
CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.
And then there was this:
For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.
Now back to the fact that your are running from the FACT that unless you can prove diary record (NOT PHONE LOGS) were destroyed no law was broken.
Stop.
I had to tell you what 3.5 is.
This is about Grifty's activities on Jan 6th. The 7 hr. gap is there....we've been offered the excuses and whataboutisms..
But there is a second layer of record keeping. It too is lacking.
Somebody has offered yet another reason.
But we KNOW he made calls, from the WH during that time.
THAT'S the point.
There is no question that Grifty was making a deliberate effort to evade scrutiny.
It's like a vandalized government record pissing directly into your rheumy eyeballs.