23 Mar 2025 12:44 am
Make the case for this. ^ROG62 » Yesterday, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the problem being he's cherry picking, dramatizing and making specious claims without all of the facts / reasoning behind the changes....if true...
He is quoting an internal memo. It spells out precisely what he says it spells out.
What did he cherry pick? What did he over-dramatize? What claim was specious? On what do you base that opinion?
Make a **** case. You think I WANT that **** to be true? That's MY social security the *** is talking about.
And it just so happens, I remember very well how hard the republicans worked to **** over the post office so they could part it out and give it to their patrons for pennies on the dollar. And I was extremely gratified when their plans failed. And based on that memo - and on the usual suspects Musk has unleashed on the SSA - it looks like Dore is correct. They are doing the exact same thing to Social Security.
He is also correct that American seniors are ENTITLED to that money. It is THEIR money, being returned at paltry interest.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?