Technocrat » 20 Jul 2014 7:42 pm » wrote:So, what Richclem is saying is that we shouldn't trust the academic work of professional historians about historical issues-such as economic history. Instead, we ought to trust Richclem and the fine, unbiased "experts" at the National Review or Wall Street Journal opinion page.
Historians talking about historical issues? Utter nonsense!

The topic was Economics, moonbat.
When is the last time a liberal didn't bungle Economics?
Say, speaking of, how's that roaring Obama Economy
with its glorious 12% real unemployment rate?
And who says liberal Academics aren't biased?