26 Mar 2025 8:38 pm
That is not the half of it. Security around Oswald should have been even tighter BEFORE the killing of Kennedy. Identifying potential threats is job one of the secret service detail protecting a president. Oswald was 500 miles from Dallas, and Kennedy's appearance there was public news for days in advance. There'd have been a watch on a radical political agitator who had previously defected to the soviet union and then been allowed back into the country - the only case of that happening ever. A guy like that? A unicorn with a (LITERAL) bullhorn? Give me a break. That guy would be eyes-on 24/7 even WITHOUT a presidential visit in a town near him.RebelGator » 21 Mar 2025, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ You would think security would have been pretty tight around Oswald but Jack Ruby managed to kill him....a guy that was conveniently dying of cancer. That tied up a lot of loose ends and stretched the bounds of coincidence a bit much for me.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?