*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
*Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Looks like I won that debate. BV is is diverting.
I guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government.
Run, Options Boy, Run.
How so?
How many "decimations" in a 25% reduction ?
guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government
literally and inarguably did so.
*Huey » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑
You are the math whiz. Do it yourself. And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.
Go with this. In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
Why are you running and reframing, options? **** ******! ;)
Let's try this again. After you return to the current discussion, Options, we can address your diversion.
You know where to find me, "All talk no Action". Will you bring a dumbbell, Cat Stuben?