ROG62 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
WI is rife with voter corruption... I found the SC narrative interesting as how "it's a referendum on Trump" ...which is ****...
https://x.com/PeterBernegger/status/1907170248383467736
It's been touted as "the most expensive judicial race ever" but not disclosing 80% of her funding came from out of state sources, namely Soros while only mentioning Elon's name in every breath and his "influencing the election"...
judicial positions should never be about politics or "ideology"...but that's what it's come down to...
Well, I can understand that with the abortion issue, why Wisconsin would vote for a liberal judge. The fact is, other races tipped the House of Representatives even more Republican - I believe Republicans picked up 2 seats in Wisconsin. I understand that with a liberal judge and gerrymandering, that in several years, the Republicans might lose those seats. But, for now, it gives Republicans more victories.