User avatar
Vegas
2 Apr 2025 12:39 pm
2 Apr 2025 12:39 pm
User avatar
Giant Slayer
16,646 posts
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: No...I've proved my point.

There is no "deeper meaning".

Is it, or is it not, an example of Survivorship bias? 

No.

Did the Biden Administration manipulate or misrepresent them?

No.

Have I demonstrated that you're a moron, again?

Clearly.

We're done.
 Your OP and this is the **** you do. Turn it around. Like always.
The grand finale: “we’re done,” declared unilaterally, like that somehow erases the fact that you still haven’t touched the actual argument. You didn’t prove anything except that you don’t understand what survivorship bias is beyond a surface-level Google skim. You focused on how the data is collected, not how it’s interpreted—or misinterpreted—by the media and political actors to shape a narrative.
As for your “no deeper meaning” line… yeah, that tracks. If it had depth, you’d have drowned by now.

1. he still won't define survivorship bias or net jobs. 
2. Blame me
3. flip it around onto me. 
 
Retarded Horse's view on women.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
  • I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
  • I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
  • PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum