2 Apr 2025 12:41 pm
No..the only questions have been answered.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your OP and this is the **** you do. Turn it around. Like always.
The grand finale: “we’re done,” declared unilaterally, like that somehow erases the fact that you still haven’t touched the actual argument. You didn’t prove anything except that you don’t understand what survivorship bias is beyond a surface-level Google skim. You focused on how the data is collected, not how it’s interpreted—or misinterpreted—by the media and political actors to shape a narrative.
As for your “no deeper meaning” line… yeah, that tracks. If it had depth, you’d have drowned by now.
1. he still won't define survivorship bias or net jobs.
2. Blame me
3. flip it around onto me.
Lines bright enough to blind have been established.