Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
38,267 posts
Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
No, Veghead—here’s the actual deal: you answer the question first,
clearly and directly, and then we’ll see if there’s anything there worth responding to.
But if your answer is just another smug dodge, condescending deflection, or incoherent rant, then you’re not proving anything except your own ignorance.
If you can’t defend your argument without forcing preconditions, just admit you don’t know what you’re talking about and spare us the theater.
Deal?
1. Of course he will evade. Still refuses to defend his OP.
We can discuss such a deal AFTER your confession.
Of course you will welsh, but everyone will clearly see what a lying coward you are.
Do we have a deal?