8 Apr 2025 3:54 am
Understood.jerrab » Yesterday, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ kennedy wanted to not send american gis to viet nam and wanted to stop israel influence in american politics. two reasons maybe why people wanted him out of the picture.
However, the facts of the case and the evidence do not support multiple shooters.
If so other people would be hurt, numerous other wounds in Kennedy and the limo would be filled with bullet holes.
Oswald walked into work with curtain rods that day.
They were never found.
A rifle was found with his finger prints.
The bullets that killed Kennedy was fired from that rifle.
And the man that owned that rifle fled the scene.
He killed a police officer and 11 witnesses identified him.
However, Mark Lane finds one witness that claimed the shooter was short and heavy. Oswald was not heavy.
And that's enough to ignore the 11 other witnesses?
He went into a movie theater and the gun that killed Tippet was in his possession.
And when approached he pointed the gun at the officer?
Does this sound like an innocent man to you?
If you look at the evidence it's rather overwhelming.
If you watch the movie JFK it's rather silly.
There's no evidence that multiple shooters were walking around Dealey that day with loaded rifles.