User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 6:53 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
greatnpowerfuloz » 22 Jul 2014 5:04 pm » wrote:Then why wasn't THAT issue brought before the Supreme Court? This was a decision ruled on for its 1st amendment merits, not on the merits of commerce.

If you don't understand the difference, just say so.
Hey moonbat, why didn't you address this point? You and Ginsberg are stupidly wrong.

No one was preventing women from buying birth control. No women's rights were being violated.

The issue was over whether individuals running small corporations could be coerced into buying something for employees, that grossly violated their religious beliefs.
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search