Vegas » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Ah, another Veghead thread where the sarcasm is rich, the substance is missing, and the punchline is… “Duh.” Powerful stuff. I’m sure the economic community is trembling in awe.
Now, I fully expect you to go through your patented 4-step evasion cycle:
Step 1: I ask you a direct question
Step 2: You deflect with a smug question of your own
Step 3: I remind you of the original question
Step 4: You accuse
me of evading while continuing to dodge
Rinse, repeat, and somewhere along the line, pretend you’ve won the argument without ever making one.
So let’s save time: every time you dodge, I’ll dodge right back in your threads. That’s the deal.
1. Based on your track record, I expect to see Step 4 deployed before lunch.
Look at
@Blackvegetable evade He already dodged. This coward.
So here’s a fair question—one that, of course, you won’t answer, but I’ll ask it anyway because unlike you, I don’t fear actual engagement:If the EU offered a zero-tariff deal, and Trump were to accept it (which would eliminate tariff-based revenue), what alternative revenue mechanisms would you expect his administration to realistically pursue—and do you think they’d actually succeed in passing them through Congress?
1. He will hide behind some excuse like his last reply.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993