Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
39,268 posts
Vegas » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
And there is step 3. 100% accuracy.

The “prove you understand it first” move—the ultimate stall tactic for someone with no intention of defending their own point. If your OP needs a decoder ring just to be understood, maybe it’s not the readers who are confused, Professor Vaguehead. But go ahead—chalk this up as
dodge #68. You're not answering questions, you're auditioning for the role of forum fog machine.
Step 4 is next.
No..
It is why your "questions", like your threads, die in utero.
You don't know anything.