Liberal Forum

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 10:18 am » wrote: That's a complete and utter lie. I use two definitions of Socialism. You refuse to accept one, in typical dishonest troll fashion.

I have quoted you, recently, using five. That's with snap backs intact.

But let's use YOUR claim. Two? And you use them depending on what partisan point you are trying to push.

It's odd that with two to choose between, BOTH of your "definitions" of socialism allow the government (of Singapore, and Singapore only) to own the means of production and still not fall within the parameters of your all-new, Heritage inspired definitions, son.

Everyone on this board can remember that Obama investing America's money in GM equaled socialism. America was not the ONLY investor, as is the case with Singapore's sovereign wealth fund - just one investor among many, with no day-to-day oversight of the company. The only differences between what Obie did and what Singapore does are these two:

1. Obie only invested a piddling amount in the market, and
2. You called what Obie did "socialism."