14 Apr 2025 6:59 pm
The lie was lozenged in. It was the pretense that there was genuinely a contest - that the matter was unsettled, up for grabs. And there was more than one lie. The pretense that he was just concerned about party unity was a lie. He was in the tank for the hor.DeezerShoove » Today, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ The inauthenticity goes both ways. What Maher mentioned about "the guy I met" vs "the guy at the podium" is him validating what I have heard before. Trump and Maher both have a job to do.
Publicly, they have their armor on. Can't wear that all the time.
Like Robin Williams.
Not always funny and light-hearted. Privately, we all have to contend with . . . ourselves.
Richard Jeni comes to mind, as well.
That "swear allegiance to Harpy" IF she wins (but not to Bernie) really isn't inauthentic, is it?
To my way of thinking, it was uber-authentic. Evil, but not really a lie.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?