Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 11:04 am » wrote: You claimed to employ only two definitions of socialism, yet persist in this third one.^ You claim that, BY DEFINITION, havng Heritage rank you as relatively free makes you "not" socialist.

So that is THREE definitiions that you prattle on about - always depending which one suits your immediate partisan purpose. How effeminate can you possibly be, man-titties?

Hey moonbat, both definitions of Socialism require government control of an economy by force of law or regulation.

That is the opposite of freedom.

So Heritage's Index is for practical purposes a ranking of the degree of Socialism of a country.

Why not compare it to the dictionary definition of the word socialist. instead?

I quoted a secondary definition, which you still have not acknowledged is valid.

Get back to me when you have the integrity to do so.