Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 11:31 am » wrote:

You won't agree to use the dictionary to define terms, so the challenge is inauthentic and insincere.

I'm very sorry that your psychosis prevents you from seeing what's obvious to any normal, sane person.

Socialism can be direct government ownership. We agree on that.

The secondary definition is:

A political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated......

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/de ... /socialism

So either accept the Oxford definition or f*** off.