Yesterday 7:18 am
Starting trouble as an invitee on a visa is a far cry different from being deported for wrongthink.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ THE bottom line: He's being deported for wrongthink. That's woke.
Since NOT ONE JEW has suffered anything beyond feigned panic, feigned victimhood, and butthurt, I think the issue is moot whether anyone is being protected. Someone is being ELEVATED. Trump can (and does) verbally fellate jews all day long as a private citizen. As a president, he has no right to elevate them above others. If Americans cannot organize economic boycotts of israel , AS THEY DID AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA, WHICH WAS ALSO APARTHEID, without risking governmental sanction, then israel owns the US and the US is israel's bitch.
And that is the situation on the ground. The US is israel's bitch - and trump is sucking off netanyahu noisily and publicly and shamelessly. It goes without saying that rubio is likewise on that dick (among others).
It's the ADL doing the defining. And they are literally making it "anti-semitic" to speak against israel's genocide. The ADL is an unregistered agent of a foreign government - as is AIPAC. Right before his murder, Kennedy pointed this out and took a hard stand that they had to register as foreign agents, limiting their ability to influence government through bribes. I mean contributions.
He cut off billions from harvard. That's economic consequences, writ large.
I am not the one who hijacked the word Semite. That's the zionists - all the way. And they did it for a reason. They are supremacists who believe God gave them dominion over Christians, and they insist that we make it "worse" to hate jews than to hate ***. People who hate *** are seen as backwards. People who hate jews are seen as evil. And this is not an accident - and the word "anti-Semitism" is an important thread in the tapestry of jewish supremacy that requires tugging. I'm a **** tugger.
I've already said what I have to say about Trump's actions. You can respond intelligently to them, or you can blather on about Trump, "fellate", "israel's bitch", rubio riding a dick, hating jews and ***, etc.
As for Apartheid in South Africa - I was 100% for it. It worked and worked well for South Africa. Much much better than what they have now. When your GLOBALISTS started protesting here in the US about how South Africa ran its country, I treated them about as well as the Vietnam protesters treated our Military. And, that's all I have to say about that.
Like I said, I'm not into debates over definitions. That's a circle-jerk I've never been much interested in. I really don't care who "defines" what. I know what a girl is. I know what a boy is. I know what a fruitcake is. And, I know what a semite is.
As for Harvard, I'm glad Trump cut off billions from Harvard. Go back and look at some of my topics (some of which were in the "other" forum). I've been **** on Harvard for about a decade now. If Trump cut off the government's money supply to Harvard (and other Ivy League Huge endowment scammers) simply because he doesn't like green eggs and ham, I'd be thrilled.
Going back to what I POSTED in response to one of your posts in this thread, I was discussing, and thought we were discussing, what Trump could do and what he cannot do from a Constitutional perspective. In that regard, I did not get much in the way of a response from you to what I actually wrote.