Skans » Today, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑
Starting trouble as an invitee on a visa is a far cry different from being deported for wrongthink.
I've already said what I have to say about Trump's actions. You can respond intelligently to them, or you can blather on about Trump, "fellate", "israel's bitch", rubio riding a dick, hating jews and ***, etc.
As for Apartheid in South Africa - I was 100% for it. It worked and worked well for South Africa. Much much better than what they have now. When your GLOBALISTS started protesting here in the US about how South Africa ran its country, I treated them about as well as the Vietnam protesters treated our Military.
And, that's all I have to say about that.
Like I said, I'm not into debates over definitions. That's a circle-jerk I've never been much interested in. I really don't care who "defines" what. I know what a girl is. I know what a boy is. I know what a fruitcake is. And, I know what a semite is.
As for Harvard, I'm glad Trump cut off billions from Harvard. Go back and look at some of my topics (some of which were in the "other" forum). I've been **** on Harvard for about a decade now. If Trump cut off the government's money supply to Harvard (
and other Ivy League Huge endowment scammers) simply because he doesn't like green eggs and ham, I'd be thrilled.
Going back to what I POSTED in response to one of your posts in this thread, I was discussing,
and thought we were discussing, what Trump could do and what he cannot do from a Constitutional perspective. In that regard, I did not get much in the way of a response from you to what I actually wrote.