Today 10:36 am
Vegas » Today, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Ah yes—Mary’s morning routine: copy headline, paste quotes, toss in one sarcastic jab, and… that’s it. No analysis, no context, no original thoughts. Just a smug “gotcha” and a vague jab at “Fondler,” as if we’re all supposed to be keeping up with his grudge board.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation #3:
Level 1 – Remembering:
You copied the Bloomberg summary and remembered some numbers. Congrats—you can read.
Level 2 – Understanding:
No explanation of why this investor shift matters long-term, how it compares to other historical selloffs, or how policy uncertainty impacts valuation. You just parroted a strategist and tossed in snark.
Level 3 – Applying and above:
Absolutely not. No real application, no comparative analysis, no discussion of policy alternatives or investor behavior. You didn’t use the information—you just flung it like a Twitter drive-by.
Final Rating: Bloom’s Level 1.2 — Copy, paste, insult, repeat.
Your Question (which will be ignored like the last 120):
Take your time, Mary. I’ll go ahead and pre-tag this Dodge #121.
1. Continue to lie about why he is owed 121 dodges.
it's a "trade"...No explanation of why this investor shift matters long-term
It isn't measured in "long term"..
It matters for the same reasons ALL reversals of capital flow matter. Reasons I, with my demigod like patience, couldn't hope to make understandable to an inbred **** narcissist...
My turn...
Looking around your man cave/guest privvy, do you see any other inbred **** narcissists?